Vedic Enlightenment Science of India

Vedic Enlightenment Science of India

Vedic Enlightenment Science of India: Vision of Modern Historians & History of India

The biggest confusion of modern historians about India comes to the fore that they consider the Indus Valley Civilization to be the world’s first developed urban civilization, but consider the Vedic civilization to be later.

The historians of the western world kept Indian history very confused.

The problem was that he wanted to value his place and his culture.

Vedic Enlightenment Science of India

He understood that Indian history and Vedic culture was as old as he could imagine. In this state of confusion, he could not say anything about the composition and period of the Vedas and the epics, because if he had talked about the composition some time ago, then his hypotheses given about many creators would have been disturbed.

For thousands of years before the science of printing or writing books, the hymns of the Vedas were being passed through Shruti Smriti.

Modern historians also did not deny this, but Shruti and Smriti cannot be obtained from any excavation.

Modern Historians and India

The biggest confusion of modern historians about India comes to the fore that they consider the Indus Valley Civilization to be the world’s first developed urban civilization, but consider the Vedic civilization to be later.

The problem with this is that according to modern history, the Indus Valley Civilization was very developed and later the civilization declined in the Vedic period.

You must be finding this thing ridiculous but this is what is being taught in history books at the moment.

They do not doubt that the Indus Valley Civilization was the first urban civilization because they have found evidence of it in excavations.

All the sites like Mohenjodaro, Harappa, Kalibanga are living proof of this. You might be surprised to know that no one knew about it before 1920. R. D. Banerjee first started looking for evidence of Indus Valley Civilization after excavation. It was a matter of time when India was recovering from the continuous attacks and loot.

Certainly, it was the English archaeologists who came to know about the historicity of India and started looking for evidence based on modern science.

The first thing that is certain is that the research on the history of India has been done only in 100 years. Whereas the Indus Valley Civilization alone is more than 5000 years old.

Modern historians have also acknowledged their two weaknesses regarding India. The first is that they have not been able to read the pictographic script used during the Indus Valley Civilization to date.

Secondly, they have not been able to properly mark the Vedic period. Some of the popular methods of knowing history are excavation of sites of archaeological importance, the study of ancient literature and script, and research and guesswork about the prevailing tools. Along with this, evidence is also collected based on metal use.

The purpose of this article is not to discourage modern efforts, but to show great potential to researchers working on the history of India. Modern historians are still preserving their evidence.

The analysis is done based on these. Whereas in India this work continued till the time of Nalanda University. The evidence kept there was destroyed by the invaders.

This was not a sudden attack, it was a well-planned conspiracy and the aim was to destroy the evidence that had made India prosperous despite all the loot.

Ignorant tribal civilizations invaded India out of greed, but they were also frustrated by this inexhaustible source of prosperity, which is called knowledge. I will write a separate article on the invaders, but here let me mention Bakhtiyar Khilji, who abolished Nalanda University thrice.

Historians like Vincent Smith have believed that-

The ancient knowledge science of India was abolished here because there were not only religions but also departments of medicine, science and philosophy.

Based on what the Chinese students learned and wrote from here, now some evidence of the philosophy department can be found here.

For your information, let me also tell you that this Khilji was from where the Taliban is today. From the thinking of the Taliban of today, you can attest to how much prosperity and social order still irritated the tribal civilizations at that time.

India and its history

Aryabhatta had also been the head of Nalanda. At the time of Hiuen Tsang, Shilabhadra was the chief here. There used to be various departments and their heads.

A detailed article can be written on Nalanda, but in this article, we are only analyzing the aspects which have been neglected by modern historians.

It is necessary to understand Nalanda because the field of modern research is very new and this work was being done in India from 500 AD (based on the evidence of modern history).

The important topic is that the establishment of Nalanda also dates back to the Buddhist period. Before this, there was also the Jain period and much before that the Vedic period.

There is also a big mistake in understanding the Vedic period that modern history cars have mixed up the Indus Valley Civilization and the Vedic period. The Indus Valley Civilization dates back to 3300 BC.

It has been told and the period of the composition of the Vedas has been divided into two parts.

Rig Vedic period to 1500 BC. and the later Vedic period, in which the remaining three Vedas were composed, is dated to 1200 BC. is being told. These are the facts that are being taught to the students of history at present.

Let me tell you one more surprising thing, that modern science which does not talk without evidence, falls silent on the transition period of Indus Valley Civilization and Vedic Civilization.

He gets entangled there in unconfirmed hypotheses such as maybe a flood, maybe a war, maybe this or that. You can also study modern history books to confirm this.

Heidelberg is the oldest university in Germany. If you search Indology on the university’s website, according to Indian tradition, a picture of Saraswati, the goddess of learning, is visible.

Not only is Saraswati important in the Vedic period, but the Indus Valley Civilization has also been linked to the Saraswati river.

Surely the worship of Saraswati must have been in the Indus Valley period also. No one will be seen talking on the statue of Nataraja found in the excavation.

The idol of Goddess Prakriti is also kept only as evidence, no attempt is made to arrive at any interpretation from it, as it would give falsehood to the hypothesis of coming later in the Vedic period.

Of course, worship of nature also took place during the Indus Valley Civilization, but modern historians consider the worship practices and the emergence of nature and deities as the Vedic period or the post-Indus Valley period.

Any Indian would consider it ridiculous, but see the irony of our today’s history students studying the same history and giving UPSC exams. What do you expect from them? They will make further concepts on what they read.

The Saraswati Sanskrit Award is also given for the promotion of Sanskrit in the courses mentioned in Heidelberg University. Similarly, Indology i.e. Indology is taught at the Martin Luther University of Halle Wittenberg.

There is an Institute for Indology in Myints. The Universities of Tübingen and Bonn also enrol some students in Indology every year.

India in the eyes of the world

It is necessary to write this love of Sanskrit and India in Germany because Max Müller, whom modern historians consider the basis of their knowledge of Indian history, belonged to this Germany.

He knew very well what the Vedas are and how ancient is the tradition of Indian knowledge science.

They had their own compulsions, they got the job only on the condition that they would Christianize them by understanding the Vedas because if they want to capture the Indian public, it will have to be done by their methods.

This ill-fated attempt has ruined Indian history and perhaps this irony has led to confusion about the Vedic period, which today’s history allegedly accepts, while Germany understood the importance of Sanskrit and the Vedas, and perhaps this The reason is that even today Indology is an important subject there.

The Vedic tradition in India was never dependent on books or scripts, so there is no doubt that it will remain intact despite all the destructions. This is the reason why Max Muller also depended on his contemporary Dayanand Saraswati.

I will write a separate detailed article on Max Müller’s work, as there will be digressions here. Broadly speaking, understand that Max Müller wanted to blur the brilliance of the Vedas, because if the full glory of the Vedic tradition was kept in front, then a spiritual revolution would have been seen all over the world.

In India, this effort was made by people like Dayanand Saraswati and Vivekananda, which was started by Adi Shankaracharya. This is the reason that even today, whatever the modern historians say, there is no doubt in the minds of Indian scholars about the Indian Vedic Vangmaya.

You can also understand that along with the understanding of India by modern historians, there is a parallel stream of restoration of Indian Vedic literature.

We are in no hurry to put the label of the western education system here. The basic element of the Vedas is Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam and the basic aim of the Vedic tradition is Sarve Bhavantu Sukhinah.

The good thing is that those who tried to manipulate it, presented only the evidence of Vedic tradition, they did not harm.

For example, modern historians have gained nothing from Max Müller’s work, otherwise, they may not have mentioned the Vedic civilization at all.

I want to put one more example at the end of this article which is very important.

Epics, stories, poems were given a special place in every history of the world, but when it comes to the history of India, historians keep calm by calling historical texts like Ramayana and Mahabharata just fictional saga.

I claim that if any modern historian reads only Valmiki Ramayana, then he will understand how much has been written in the Ayodhya case regarding the urban system.

This not only gives an idea of ​​urban life but also gives an important introduction to the ethos and knowledge science of that time.

India has been the land of devotion and here the relationship between the devotee and God has kept the society tied. This is an irrefutable truth even today.

Tulsidas ji’s Bhaktimarg set a living example of this during the Mughal period.

The same fear remained with the historians of the time and they tried their best to show India as weak in history. His Indian disciples who followed his education system did the same thing and are doing it even today.

The need now is to restore the Vedic Vangmaya systematically, just as Adi Shankara did.

Share This


Wordpress (0)
Disqus (0 )